Category Archives: Flight

Look Ma, No Gyros

This spring, we installed two GI-275 Electronic Flight Instruments in the Bellanca, replacing the vacuum-powered attitude indicator, the vacuum-powered directional gyro, and the GTN-650’s CDI. The GI-275 is round, steam-gauge form factor electronic flight instrument that can present attitude indicator, horizontal situation indicator, course deviation indicator, moving map, or engine instrumentation pages, depending on how it is installed and used. Importantly, unlike the cheaper G5 Electronic Flight Instrument, the GI-275 can provide attitude source data for the Century IIb autopilot that is installed in the Bellanca, so I was able to remove the vacuum attitude indicator. While I could have removed the altimeter, airspeed, and backup attitude indicator, I chose to leave them for now, to have an extra level of redundancy. I did remove the vertical speed indicator, both because it is not really needed in an emergency situation and because the existing VSI desperately needed to be overhauled. The new panel configuration is pictured below (taken during annual, so the kick panels and carpet are not installed):

The HSI can display GPS or VOR/LOC input from the GTN 650 or VOR/LOC input from the SL30, including bearing pointers from any of the three sources. Because both 275s replaced primary instruments, they can only present a subset of the pages that the 275 generally supports. The top 275 can only display the ADI page (although that includes CDI indicators) and the bottom 275 can only display the ADI, HSI, and “HSI Map” page.

The big win in all the updates is that I no longer need a vacuum system. The vacuum pump, regulator, filter, pressure gauge, and hoses all came out, saving 7 lbs. I’ve had 3 gyro failures in 12 years, and dry vacuum pumps are notorious for total failure without warning, so the increase in reliability should be a real win.

Functionality Gained

The biggest functional gain is the switch from DG + CDI to an HSI, which presents two instrument’s worth of information in one instrument. The ADI can display airspeed, altitude, heading, and navigation deviation, which means that it can be the sole instrument needed for navigation in instrument conditions, meaning that there’s less of an instrument scan and more of an instrument focus point. The altitude and (optionally, although I don’t have it turned on) airspeed bugs are nice for quickly checking whether or not you are pointed in the right direction. Of course, I could have gotten some of this functionality replacing the DG and CDI with a vacuum HSI.

The biggest gain in functionality is the integration between the 275s and the GTN650. The 275s provide heading and baro-corrected altitude to the 650, so that it can auto-sequence heading and altitude waypoints, which are common on departure and missed approach procedures. The HSI page displays next waypoint and distance to next waypoint information, which saves space on the 650 from displaying those fields. Finally, the 275 acts as a GPS Steering driver for the Century IIb autopilot. GPS Steering (GPSS) allows the GPS to compute smooth turns to intercept new courses, based on airspeed and winds, with significantly less wandering and overshooting of sharp turns that the traditional nav input. Modern autopilots can take GPSS inputs directly from the GPS, but for older autopilots, the solution is to have an emulator box (or the 275 in this case) drive heading inputs.

Complaints

There are a couple of things I don’t like about the 275s. There’s an altitude trend indicator (where you will be in 30 seconds) and a numerical vertical speed indicator, but, unlike the larger Garmin electronic flight instruments, there is no visual vertical speed indicator. I didn’t think I would miss it and, most of the time, I don’t. However, on a recent VOR approach, it really would have been nice to have a visual VSI. When there’s glide slope information available (like a precision approach or when the 650 can generate a descent profile), it is not a huge problem, but in the situations where the 650 cannot generate an descent profile (either too steep of an approach or a VOR approach from FAF to MAP), then it is a bit of a pain.

The switch between GPSS and Heading mode for driving the autopilot is three levels deep in the menu system on the 275. In an approach environment, it is pretty common to have to switch between vectors (ie, heading mode) and own navigation (ie, gpss) fairly quickly. Garmin’s latest software version has apparently fixed this and enabled an external switch, which makes for very rapid and positive switching between the two modes.

I’ve run into trouble activating the synthetic vision functionality on the ADI (a $500 add-on). The synthetic vision itself doesn’t seem all that useful, based on the 10 hour free trial. However, the flight path marker feature is really nice for maintaining level flight in IFR, and the traffic display for converging targets is nice as well. Apparently, my problems are not unique and Garmin has been working with me to fix the issue. The next step is yet another trip to the local Garmin dealer, but at least this time, it appears it will be on Garmin’s dime.

Redundancy / Regrets

I do have a couple of regrets on how the avionics shop and I agreed to do the installation. I chose not to install the temperature probe, the panel-mount USB port, or the VFR backup GPS antenna. I should have installed all three (although I lucked out a bit on the USB ports). Because I retained the airspeed, altimeter, and backup AI, the system was not required to have a revisionary switch, which I probably should have just had them install, to future proof the installation by allowing me to remove the remaining steam gauges.

Garmin’s high speed data bus (HSDB) connectivity is used to connect the 275s and the GTN650 GPS. Despite the 650 having plenty of HSDB ports, the 275 installation manual requires that the 650 connect to the ADI and then the ADI connect to the HSI. This means if the ADI completely fails, then the HSI unit does not have connectivity to a GPS source. The magnetometer also has to be wired to the ADI, due to some issue with the autopilot integration (this was the source of many calls between the shop and Garmin), because logical thought suggests the magnetometer should be hooked up to the HSI and the manual is very unclear on the point), which means that if the ADI completely fails, the HSI unit also does not have heading indication. It does have an internal ADAHRS unit, so I’ll know which way is up, how high I am, and how fast I’m going, but I won’t know which way I’m going. The best solution appears to be connecting the glare-shield VFR-only WAAS GPS antenna to the HSI unit. Then, if the ADI unit fails, I will still lose connectivity between the GTN650 and the HSI and still lose the magnetometer, but the HSI unit will be able to build its own ground track, which is good enough in an emergency. If the HSI completely fails, the ADI can still talk to the GTN650 and display course deviation indicators and heading, so I’m good there as well.

The temperature probe is optional in my install, because the existing RC Allen RCA2610 attitude indicator includes a rate of turn indicator. But to remove the 2610, I would have to add the temperature probe so that the 275 can generate standard rate of turn indicators on the ADI. The only real challenge is finding a mounting location that is in the approved lightening zone, not in the sun when in level flight, and not in the exhaust stream. It looks like the wing inspection cover to inspect the rear spar attach bolts might be the best option. Not a huge hurry, but probably would have been simpler to have this done at the start.

Finally, the panel-mount USB charger ports do not add any features, but, in addition to providing USB device power from ship’s power, they provide a USB data port to the GI-275. Rather than having to blindly reach behind the panel to find the USB port for database upgrades, I could plug a USB drive into the panel mount port and be good to go. At some point, I will have the cigarette lighter replaced with the USB port, if nothing else, to remove the cigarette lighter.

Conclusions

Despite the little complaints, I’m really happy with the improvements for flying IFR. The 275s are definitely more complex than the vacuum instruments they replaced, but the improvement in flying in IFR conditions is incredible. The altitude bug (with audible deviation beeps), minimums callout, and the greatly simplified scan all make flying IFR more enjoyable. With a couple of software improvements in the works, I think I’m going to be even happier with the panel upgrades. I do wish that Garmin would add support for flight plan transfer between the 275’s Connext bluetooth interface and the GTN650. If that existed, I could remove the FlightStream 210 and have one fewer box in the airplane.

While the shop was installing the flight instruments, I also had them replace the Narco AT-150 transponder and the GDL-88 ADS-b in/out boxes with the Garmin GTX345r remote ADS-b transponder. In addition to allowing me to gain some useful load and remove the 18,000′ altitude restriction, it also frees up some much needed panel space, as the 345r is controlled by the GTN650 display.

A Round Motor Enters our Lives

Some of my friends are bad influences on my retirement account. In the spring of 2018, I decided to get a tailwheel endorsement, so that I could fly airplanes with the third wheel in the back. Tailwheel airplanes are trickier to deal with on the ground, because the center of gravity is behind the main wheels and if you don’t keep the airplane pretty much straight on landing, the tail attempts to get in front of the nose, and that’s bad. AirFacts has a reasonable article on why this is both a good and bad thing. Now that I could fly taildraggers, it seemed reasonable to own a taildragger. Also, I caught the round motor bug somewhere along the way. So the second half of last year was spent semi-seriously looking for a taildragger with a round motor that wouldn’t immediately try to kill me. This limited the choices somewhat. There were some round motor Bellanca examples. Fairchild 24Ws are nice. Cessna 190/195s are a bit bigger, but not unreasonable.

In November, a 1940 Fairchild 24W-41A which still had the Warner 165 engine came up for sale in the Puget Sound area. After some back and forth, Jess and I decided to buy the plane. N28525 was built in 1940 as a Fairchild 24W-40, with a Warner 145, which is a 145 HP engine with greased rocker arms. That means greasing the engine every 10 hours, because the grease slowly escapes onto the plane. In 1945, the plane went back to Fairchild to be converted to a 24W-41A, which is basically a 24W-40, but with a Warner 165. The Warner 165 is 165 HP and, more importantly, lubricates its rocker ams with oil instead of grease. Much less maintenance and mess.

Last weekend was the first of a couple of weekends of transition training in the aircraft. We found a couple of minor issues (the radio needs replacement), but overall it flies really well. I’m looking forward to a summer of trips to nearby locations. For now, the plan is to keep the Bellanca, as it’s much better suited for long flights or IFR conditions.

1940 Fairchild 24W-41A

So that happened…

In the fall of 2015, I made some avionics upgrades to the Bellanca. The Narco Mk12D Nav/Com (and its indicator), Collins AMR350 audio panel, Sigtronics intercom, and 121.5 MHz ELT were removed. In their place, we installed a Garmin GTN650 Nav/Com/GPS, Garmin GI-106A indicator, PS Engineering PMA450 audio panel, Garmin GDL88 ADS-b unit, and AmeriKing 406 MHz ELT. After all the upgrades, the panel looked pretty good.

We flew the plane a couple times after the install, and it worked great. The day after Thanksgiving 2015, I flew down to the avionics shop to have the GDL-88’s software updated to the latest release. That part all went well. On the way home, I was a bit rushed due to some time constraints and then got into a busy pattern (no problem) with helicopters in the pattern. There was a coyote on the runway and I had to go around (again, no problem), but got behind a helicopter in the pattern and somehow didn’t get the gear down before landing (big problem!). The result was ugly.

Later investigation during repair would find that the gear alarm had been disabled during the avionics install, so the backup to the human had failed. No excuse, but irritating when I discovered what had happened. I was left with a choice: take the insurance payout and write the plane off or do most of the repair labor myself (overseen by a friendly IA, of course). I went for the repair option, which took all of 2016. The structural damage was actually pretty minimal. The inner two ribs of both flaps needed to be repaired and the trailing edge replaced, then the flaps were recovered. Minor repairs to the right wing’s 2nd rib were required. The strobe mounting bracket on the belly was removed (due to damage) and replaced with a stringer, then the fabric damage repaired. The nose gear had to be disassembled, inspected, repaired, and reinstalled. The engine went to Western Skyways for a major overhaul and is nice and shiny and clean now. The prop governor was overhauled and the prop replaced. The nav lights and belly strobe were replaced with AeroLED nav/strobe kits and the landing/taxi lights replaced with Whelen Parmetheus Plus lights. I replaced all the seat belts and added BAS inertia reel shoulder harnesses for the front seats. And, because I hadn’t changed enough things, pulled the VAL INS-422 Nav radio and King KY-97A Com radio and installed a Garmin SL-30 Nav/Com and another GI-106A indicator. Also removed the clock and installed a Guardian Aero 553 carbon monoxide detector. And, in proof that AmeriKing really was making crap, the almost new ELT didn’t pass inspection, so I pulled it and installed a Artex ELT 1000 unit.

First flight was January 5, 2017 and lasted about 1.25 hours. The airplane performed almost perfectly. The avionics upgrades all worked perfectly, as did the lights, gear, flaps, and such. Despite the flap rebuild and re-rigging both the flaps and ailerons, the airplane flew straight and level. Only two real problems during the flight: the need to turn up the prop governor to get some more RPMs at full power and a flaky left magneto. The mag has been pulled, sent to Western Skyways, repaired, and returned. Now time for propeller adjustments and a spring of hard flying to finish the engine break-in.

Bellanca-Champion West Coast Fly-In

I finally made it to Columbia, CA (O22) for the Bellanca-Champion West Coast Fly-In this weekend. The West Coast Fly-In is widely regarded as the largest gathering of Bellanca airplanes anywhere in the world, and this year the triple tails had a good showing with close to 20 planes showing up. Three of those were Cruisemaster 260s (picture below). There was even a T-250 Aries, which I had never seen in person before.
Cruisemaster 260s
The Columbia Airport has a campground on site and the Fly-In is held at the campground. Jess and I decided to stay in town, however, as the hotels had air conditioning and it was hot the whole weekend. It’s about a 1 mile walk to the campground from the town if you know the secret path, which we didn’t know the first time. Live and learn. Good food was eaten, airplane stories were told, and Jess got to see her first flour bombing and spot landing contests.

New Home for the Bellanca

The Bellanca has been living in a rental hangar at Auburn Airport (S50) since last summer.  Auburn Airport’s a great little airport, and everyone has been very friendly.  However, the rental hangar has left a lot to be desired.  There’s not much light (two CFL bulbs for the whole hangar), not much power (I share a 15A breaker with two other hangars), and too much water (the concrete wasn’t properly sealed and leaches water into the hangar when it rains).  When a condo T hangar came up for sale, I decided it was time to move.  I only moved one hangar row, but now I own my own (very nice) T hangar.

11188277_10206530505607368_7029922267986968871_nThe new hangar has 80A 240V service, so power isn’t a concern.  In the old hangar, I couldn’t reliably run the air compressor, but it runs great again.  It also has 2 400W metal-halide lamps plus two sets of fluorescent tubes, so there’s no problem with light.  There’s also rough-ins for water and sewer, so I’ll be able to add a bathroom and/or utility sink in the future.  Rather than large sliding metal doors, the hangar has a Hydroswing door, so opening / closing the door is a whole lot less work.  Finally, and most importantly, there’s a proper vapor barrier under the concrete, which should help reduce my moisture problems.  If not, I’ll have to insulate the side walls and add a small heater, which should help significantly.

Now to move all my gear from the old hangar to the new hangar.  Which isn’t so easy :).

New Years Flight

Jess and I were planning on flying to The Hub at Tacoma Narrows for the Pacific Northwest Flying web board’s West Side Fly-In.  Sadly, we were a bit late getting going, but the weather was beautiful so we went flying anyway.  We’re in a streak of multiple very cold days with almost no wind, and there was definitely some haze in the air from all the fires.  But the air was still and cold, and you really can’t beat a -2000′ density altitude at takeoff.

We flew up the west side of Seattle, just outside SeaTac and Boeing airspace, then cut across Seattle to the east just north of the Space Needle then across Lake Union, along the canal, and over Lake Washington.  We did a stop-n-go at Paine Field up north, then Renton (sadly landing to the north, so no over water approach) and then back to Auburn.  All told, 1.7 hours and three landings.  Not a bad way to start the new year.  Jess took this great picture of downtown on our way to Lake Union.FOTD80A

Post-move maintenance

As I mentioned in my previous post, the Bellanca didn’t want to idle very well at sea level. This isn’t particularly surprising, since it was last adjusted during an annual at Sandia Airpark, at an elevation of 6550′. I was supposed to do a fuel pressure adjustment (high and low) yesterday, but the mechanic forgot a tool and we had to delay. The mechanic’s going to calibrate his fuel pressure gauge this week, and we’ll be able to do the run-up / calibration next weekend.

The download of the data from the flight showed some oddities in the behavior of the #5 cylinder. Either it was showing much higher exhaust gas temps than the other cylinders or was running much cooler cylinder head temps. When we took the cowl off, we also noticed some fuel stains around the intake manifold pipe for that cylinder. Hopefully, it’s just a slightly loose connection at the fuel injector, but I have some concerns that the exhaust valve is wearing out, which would be an unfortunate unexpected expense. Pretty easy to check, so I’ll know more next week.

Finally totaled the fuel for the trip from Albuquerque to Seattle. The fuel flow totalizer in the EDM-900 thinks I burned 153.5 gallons and the fuel receipts show I burned 154.4 gallons, so the computer was off by less than 1%, so I’m happy with the calibration at this point.

A New Home

I moved to Seattle, WA in March for a new job and relocated the Bellanca from New Mexico over Memorial Day weekend. We tried to take the direct route, but ran into some really bad weather over the four corners area and had to return to Albuquerque. On a second attempt at leaving New Mexico, we flew to Flagstaff, Las Vegas (Henderson), Reno (Stead), Hillsboro, and Seattle. In end, GPS says we flew 1,876.35 miles at an average speed of 132.06 MPH. From just north of Crater Lake until the Seattle area we were in the clouds as frequently as not, which was fun. We were able to make visual approaches into both Hillsboro and Everett, which was nice. Overall, the plane flew really well, although it didn’t want to idle very slowly at sea level, so some fuel calibration will be needed.

I’m still deciding where to base the Bellanca, but for now it’s going to live in a shared hangar at Paine Field in Everett, WA. Paine is the home of the Boeing wide-body factory, hence the variety of 747, 777, and 787 planes in the background.

photo

Survived another year

Well, the Bellanca survived another annual inspection. The transponder will probably need calibration before it passes inspection in two years, but it passed. No unexpected issues came up, which was a nice change. Taxing with the new alternator is great (charging the battery at idle? Weird!) and it works as well as the generator in flight. The new regulator is much better at holding constant voltage, which is not surprising.

No major squawks after the return to service flight, and the gyros work much better after the regulator was adjusted a bit higher after we found out how far off the suction gauge was pre-overhaul. The paperwork’s done, the bill’s paid, now time to fly!

2014 Annual

N8861R goes in to AirTec for it’s annual inspection tomorrow. There are no major issues I’m aware of, so it should be a fairly standard inspection and hopefully not take too long.

As with every other year, I made a couple upgrades to the airplane already:

  • Replaced the old, failing 35 amp generator and mechanical regulator with a Plane Power 70 amp alternator and solid-state regulator. In addition to more power in cruise flight (so more head room for avionics upgrades), the alternator can actually put out more power at idle than the generator could in cruise. So no more low voltage / discharge alarms on the EDM-900 during taxi! Oh, and a gain of 8 pounds of useful load helps, too.
  • Replaced the engine control cables. The old throttle and prop cables were original and starting to look real bad. The mixture cable was in good shape, but had been replaced about a decade ago, but was not the right length (it looks like someone used a pre-made size, not the factory length).
  • Returned the engine control cable mounting brackets to their (supposedly) original locations, which makes some of the tighter parts of the cowling fit a little bit better.
  • Fixed (hopefully) the fluctuations in MAP pressure by installing a snubber in the manifold pressure line.
  • Overhauled the suction gauge, which was of suspect accuracy

It’s also the year for pitot/static and transponder checks, which always makes me a bit nervous (altimeters and blind encoders aren’t cheap, and finding leaks in pitot or static lines sucks). The altimeter and blind encoder passed bench tests, so that’s one hurdle down.